Zoning

Data center ordinance

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (1)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
3

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 3, 2026.

Public comments (3)

ConcernedElizabeth JonesNov 3, 2026

Urged the council to strip any by-right data center privileges and require a dual permit track through Planning and Zoning and Council, plus C-weighted low-frequency noise limits, city-hired (developer-funded) acoustic engineers, ACC-verified grid impact certificates, and a ban on diesel generators for peak-shaving.

City Council (Special) - Nov 3, 2026 · 1:28:29 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentNov 3, 2026

Said a workshop about permitting data centers sounds like a pathway, not protection — asked why Bullhead isn't considering an outright ban like Oro Valley's unanimous 7-0 prohibition, and demanded a regional cumulative environmental and water impact assessment covering sites outside city limits.

City Council (Special) - Nov 3, 2026 · 1:39:59 →
SupportiveGrace HechtNov 3, 2026

Lives half a mile from the proposed site at the Ridge and thanked the council and commissioners for their due diligence, saying she'd met with the developer and that there's been a lot of misinformation in the community.

City Council (Special) - Nov 3, 2026 · 1:50:00 →