Docket SU26-09: Javelina Solar and Battery Energy Storage Plant
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 8, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Spoke as a representative of the Babacomari Ranch family partnership, supporting the solar lease as a way to sustain cattle ranching and land stewardship.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 1:56:35 →Raised concerns about conflicting hazardous materials disclosures on the application regarding Tier 2 chemicals and requested baseline soil testing.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 1:59:49 →Spoke on behalf of the Arizona Technology Council in support of the project, highlighting battery safety advancements and grid security benefits.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 2:01:30 →Expressed opposition, citing negative impacts on custom home property values, scenic views, and unmitigated dust from existing solar sites.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 2:04:31 →Stated she has lived in the area for 40 years, opposing the project due to loss of peace and quiet, wildlife disruption, and industrial truck traffic.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 2:06:42 →Expressed concern that Huachuca City residents bear environmental and safety risks while power is exported to Pima County without local benefits.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 2:08:48 →Expressed concern about battery thermal runaway risks, wildfire hazards, and increased property insurance rates.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 2:12:07 →Spoke as a Huachuca City mayoral candidate against the project, arguing that the land should be used for residential housing rather than expanding industrial solar.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (July 2026) — July 8, 2026 · 2:15:30 →