Project Baccara Annexation and Data Center Power Plant
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 28, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Expressed opposition to Project Baccara, citing Luke Air Force Base compatibility concerns, lack of current environmental data, and omissions in emissions modeling.
City Council (Regular) — April 28, 2026 · 18:51 →Spoke against the project due to noise concerns from nearby industrial sites, accident potential zone violations, and proximity to residential homes.
City Council (Regular) — April 28, 2026 · 22:17 →Shared opposition representing thousands of petition signers, raising safety concerns about aircraft incidents and above-ground fuel storage near residential areas.
City Council (Regular) — April 28, 2026 · 25:16 →Spoke as a resident living 2,000 feet from the site, describing the severe visual and heat impacts the 18 turbine stacks would have on her home and neighborhood.
City Council (Regular) — April 28, 2026 · 30:22 →Highlighted local ties and argued against the project's compatibility, citing explosive hazard concerns with propane storage and widespread community opposition.
City Council (Regular) — April 28, 2026 · 50:42 →Represented the developer in favor of the resolution, explaining that Luke Air Force Base issued compatibility findings and that the agreement only sets terms for future annexation.
City Council (Regular) — April 28, 2026 · 49:46 →