Project Eagle Data Center and Power Generation Facility Rezone

Voiced deep concern as the closest homeowner to the project, highlighting the negative impact on family life, wildlife, and property values.

Questioned parcel lumping, lack of flight safety studies in high accident potential zones, and health risks from large fuel storage.

Highlighted community-wide opposition, collecting thousands of signatures, and warned of relentless noise and water consumption during a drought.

Argued that simple cycle gas turbines with 72-foot stacks are inappropriate adjacent to residential areas and increase public safety risks.

Requested stronger written protections, enforceable landscape buffers, and verification of Luke Air Force Base operating conditions.

Argued that proposed setbacks and walls are inadequate compared to other valley power plants and asked the city to demand better design standards.

Suggested thoughtful site design, such as lowering power generation equipment below grade and moving noisy machinery toward the center of the site.

Voiced skepticism regarding air quality enforcement penalties and proximity of heavy industrial uses to residential homes.

A retired Air Force officer who raised questions about accountability, enforcement of Luke Air Force Base conditions, and firsthand data center noise experiences.

Spoke on behalf of the Arizona Progressive Coalition, opposing fossil-fuel burning data centers and threatening a statewide boycott campaign against Glendale if approved.