Go Lake Havasu

Argued against funding Go Lake Havasu, stating the city doesn't need the organization.

Highlighted a lack of public records, conflict of interest disclosures, and financial documentation regarding the $1.6 million annual payout to Go Lake Havasu.

Shared negative personal experiences working at the visitor center under management and criticized the board's lack of responsiveness.

Criticized Go Lake Havasu's marketing execution and social media performance, arguing tourism funds should be directed toward proven events.

A former employee spoke about a hostile work environment and poor organizational management at Go Lake Havasu.

Called for modernizing the tourism structure, citing past nepotism, lack of oversight, and boundary issues between the city and the contractor.

Defended the value of tourism funding and warned against abolishing the DMO model without a viable alternative.

Analyzed tax collections and questioned whether tourism marketing genuinely drives a significant portion of hotel bookings and restaurant visits.

Supported his daughter's testimony and criticized past management and board practices.

Criticized a reduction in Go Lake Havasu's social media posting frequency and reminded the council about trademark agreements.

Urged the city council to take stronger leadership and accountability regarding taxpayer funds.