Parks Rec

Professional Services Contract for the City’s Parks and Recreation Department Comprehensive Master Plan with Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (3)Concerned (1)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 24, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedDonna Best-CarltonFeb 24, 2026

Expressed frustration over paying for another master plan when previous studies sit on shelves and suggested partnering with the school district on a bond for sports facilities.

City Council — February 24, 2026 · 59:39 →
OpposedKelly LutzFeb 24, 2026

Argued for fiscal responsibility, stating that department heads should handle planning and assessment duties in-house rather than hiring outside consultants.

City Council — February 24, 2026 · 29:13 →
NeutralDebra HunterFeb 24, 2026

Asked about the budget allocated for city council retreats and planning sessions.

City Council — February 24, 2026 · 1:53:00 →
ConcernedDon WisdomFeb 24, 2026

Questioned whether the $250,000 contract would result in actual construction or merely more paperwork.

City Council — February 24, 2026 · 1:09:12 →
OpposedBonnie ToyFeb 24, 2026

Suggested that the $250,000 could instead be used to hire local staff for a year and questioned website updates regarding past studies.

City Council — February 24, 2026 · 2:12:05 →