Luckett Road data center

Presented three two-page executive summaries of his risk analysis of the Luckett Road data center, with QR codes linking to his full cited report, and noted Juneteenth resources.

Presented results of independent May 4 noise testing showing generator noise stayed below 65 dB, argued the test location doesn't reflect the data center's actual position, and said he's confident the cemetery won't be disturbed.

UA student urged council to weigh constituents over campaign-contribution concerns; a brief exchange with Vice Mayor Ziegler over disclosed contributions followed.

A retired engineer and National Guard veteran argued the air-cooled design just shifts water use to power plants, estimating 11,100 acre-feet of indirect annual consumption, and urged a no vote.

A Worker Power researcher questioned whether contractual protections and ratepayer safeguards are truly in place and asked the council to delay or vote no.

An AI data center and cybersecurity consultant cited the attorney general's challenge to Project Blue's rate structure and called for a six-month moratorium or a no vote.

A Northwest Firefighters Local 3572 leader and 30-year resident strongly supported the project, citing flabbergasting misinformation from opponents.

A 31-year resident acknowledged progress but cited unresolved issues and asked for a postponement or a public referendum on the project.

Praised the town's steady, orderly process and encouraged continued deliberation regardless of the outcome.

A Tucson native argued the project generates tax revenue for police, fire, roads and parks while cutting water use versus farming.

The Marana Chamber of Commerce CEO credited the town's growth record and asked the council to vote yes on both rezonings.

Arizona Commerce Authority VP called data centers critical infrastructure and cited $407 million in combined tax revenue and thousands of jobs.

A systems engineer flagged undefined terms and weak compliance mechanisms in the data center ordinance and asked for a moratorium and independent expert review.

The Marana Unified School District superintendent voiced strong support for the project and for the council's leadership and process.

The UA research VP positioned the data center as foundational infrastructure for making Southern Arizona a high-tech innovation hub.

Argued air cooling only shifts water use upstream to power plants and that the region shares one aquifer and grid; urged denial to protect farmland and ratepayers.

A 25-year Marana business owner supported the project so his kids and grandkids can stay in Marana instead of losing growth to Phoenix.

Chamber of Southern Arizona representative highlighted the project's zero local incentives and full ordinance compliance, urging approval.

A former 1987-91 council member recounted the town's history, warned against property taxes, and urged a yes vote for jobs.

Southern Arizona Leadership Council CEO urged approval, framing data centers as the backbone of the modern economy and a signal Marana is open for business.

A Tucson businessman planning to move to Marana urged approval, citing forward-thinking leadership and long-term revenue.

A carpenters union member made a personal appeal: local work means being home with his family instead of long commutes to Phoenix.

Chamber of Southern Arizona economic development officer broke down what $145 million a decade of tax revenue could fund — most of the parks budget or 60% of police.

A construction industry professional said the project provides life-changing steady local work and needed infrastructure, and urged a yes vote.

A sheet metal local 359 member said 85-90% of members currently commute two-plus hours to Phoenix; this project brings work home.

A union sheet metal worker of 12 years described waking at 2 a.m. for two-hour commutes and begged for local union work.

A SMART union member said the project keeps skilled trades working close to home and creates apprenticeship pipelines.

A painters' union representative urged approval, citing Beale's local-hire commitments and safety standards despite acknowledged water and energy concerns.

A resident and property owner since 2005 called the site the right location near industrial uses and praised the town's proactive data center ordinance.

A laborers local 1184 business rep pushed back on 'just a job' framing — construction is a career with pensions and benefits, and apprentices will be hired locally.

A Marine veteran and father of two in the laborers union asked for approval so he can be home with his kids every night.

A small-business owner near the Amazon property, raised on a polluted Lake Erie, said reading the town ordinance convinced her it's a thoughtful plan — full support.

A longtime resident tied the project to Marana's founding water mission and argued it could help keep the town property-tax-free for years.

Self-described 'internet user' argued data centers are critical infrastructure for everyone's digital lives, so better to build them here with local oversight and benefit.

A Marana resident said responsible development puts local trades to work and spreads tax dollars to roads and public safety without burdening existing residents.

A fifth-generation Southern Arizonan and Mountain View grad said a yes vote keeps Marana economically strong and retains young talent.

A community volunteer flagged developer due-diligence and liquidity concerns and urged a no vote absent much stronger end-of-life regulations.

The Arizona Building and Trades Council director said approving the rezoning creates 4,200 high-paying jobs and grows the local apprenticeship pipeline.

An ACC candidate said TEP's filings signal plans to recover data center costs in future rate cases and called the vice mayor's ties to the applicant's firm unethical; a heated exchange with the mayor followed.

Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection asked the council to delay the vote, citing missing financial assurance and unaddressed regional water impacts of the added power demand.

Iron Workers Local 75 business manager asked for approval of both rezonings, citing 4,200 local jobs for Southern Arizona members.

Came in neutral and left unconvinced — cited the project's economic footprint and unknowns, and supported a referendum or moratorium.

A 25-year resident and business owner called the project smart growth — stable, predictable revenue without straining schools or traffic.

Arizona Technology Council representative — the only speaker at the Luckett Road South hearing — voiced support and thanked council and staff.

A landscape architect pointed to the Colorado River drought feeding Arizona's power generation and suggested requiring 70-80% on-site solar generation.