Project Baccara
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 25
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 6, 2026.
Public comments (25)
Stated the power plant is equivalent to 18 jet engines and violates state statutes.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:32:09 →Ex-councilman argued the project violates state statutes regarding utilities in high noise zones and urged denial or continuance.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:11:36 →Local resident living half a mile away raised concerns about selective enforcement of state statutes and risks to families.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:16:30 →Highlighted concerns regarding massive propane backup fuel storage and explosion risks near flight paths.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:19:02 →Criticized the board for prioritizing corporate data center interests over environmental health and water resources.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:21:25 →Spoke on behalf of the opposition coalition, asking the board to vote no to protect community and pilot safety.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:23:49 →Electrical engineer with avionics experience warned that exhaust stacks would create turbulence and radar interference.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:25:14 →Expressed concern over air pollutants and water scarcity in the desert.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:27:29 →Raised concerns about toxic chemicals, water recycling safety, and health impacts on children.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:29:51 →Shared personal accounts of witnessing plane crashes near the site and questioned outdated studies.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:34:28 →Cited American Lung Association statistics on air pollution and vulnerable populations.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:36:50 →Warned that the project would destroy neighborhood peace and property values.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:39:08 →Argued that data centers worsen regional air quality and negatively affect nearby school learning environments.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 2:48:20 →Urged the board to deny the project to protect the safety and beauty of the city and county.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:42:07 →Noted military family support for Luke AFB but distinguished aviation noise from industrial utility noise.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:43:23 →Complained about 24/7 industrial noise, constant lighting, and declining quality of life.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:44:31 →Emphasized severe drought conditions and massive water usage by data centers.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 2:58:30 →Criticized county officials for prioritizing corporate profits over community trust and public health.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:49:45 →Read EPA particulate matter standards and emphasized health risks for children with asthma and diabetes.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 1:51:49 →Argued that data centers provide negligible economic benefit compared to environmental and water costs.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 2:01:03 →Pointed to projected water usage of 59 million gallons per year amid Colorado River cutbacks.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 2:02:54 →Expressed asthma health concerns and urged the board to vote no or resign.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 2:05:34 →Represented Arizona Technology Council, supporting the permit and highlighting alignment with community college data center programs.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 3:30:30 →Represented Sundt Construction, emphasizing $10 billion in local investment and responsible job creation.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 2:10:46 →Supported the project as thoughtful, forward-looking development meeting Luke Air Force Base stipulations.
Formal — May 6, 2026 · 2:12:42 →