Zoning

Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) Regulations

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (2)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 12, 2026.

Public comments (8)

SupportiveDavid WinstanleyJan 12, 2026

Supported the 1,000-foot setback for battery storage, emphasizing safety risks from his aerospace background.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 38:55 →
ConcernedSepand ElizadaJan 12, 2026

Thanked the city for code updates but expressed concern that the 1,000-foot setback could hinder Mesa's growth as a tech hub.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 21:09 →
SupportiveCourt RichJan 12, 2026

Supported adopting the BESS ordinance as written while offering industry expertise for future reviews.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 23:46 →
SupportiveBuchanan DavisJan 12, 2026

Expressed support for the BESS ordinance on behalf of Salt River Project to help meet growing energy demand.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 27:21 →
OpposedKyle WhittierJan 12, 2026

Argued that the 1,000-foot BESS setback is overly restrictive and urged the council to revisit it later.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 27:55 →
SupportiveBrian FinkJan 12, 2026

Praised the city staff for their efficient handling of the BESS ordinance process.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 30:45 →
OpposedAutumn JohnsonJan 12, 2026

Opposed the 1,000-foot setback as unsupported by data and urged future reductions.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 31:06 →
ConcernedAmanda CurtisJan 12, 2026

Supported BESS technology but opposed the 1,000-foot setback, urging alignment with national fire standards.

City Council — January 12, 2026 · 37:08 →