Chimney Canyon Solar Energy Project
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 13
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Sep 8, 2026.
Public comments (13)
Expressed concerns about solar-related battery fires, hazardous chemical risks, water usage, and the overall land footprint and efficiency of solar farms.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 1:33:41 →A fifth-generation Joseph City resident spoke against surrounding the community with solar fields, citing loss of wildlife habitat, dust, and impacts on agricultural character.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 1:34:09 →Asked about specific points of contact for developments and how environmental incidents or oil leaks are documented and reported.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 2:43:00 →Shared concerns about seeing massive solar installations from hundreds of miles away in airplanes and urged the board to act against landscape domination.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 1:41:52 →Representing Aztec Land and Cattle Company, spoke in favor of the project, emphasizing job creation and economic opportunities for future generations.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 2:50:00 →A neighboring landowner whose family owns a 160-acre homestead near the project expressed full support, praising the developer's open communication.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 1:43:28 →Opposed the project, arguing that out-of-town contractors cut corners, property values drop, and county staff appeared too supportive of the developer.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 1:48:35 →Requested that the board slow down approval to protect cultural and archaeological resources and formally involve the Hopi and Zuni tribes.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 2:41:26 →Complained about constant construction dust exceeding opacity limits from nearby solar projects and out-of-state workers.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 1:55:39 →Asked whether developers have written commitments for local hiring percentages and donations to local schools, fire services, and EMS.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 1:57:13 →Argued that private land rights do not give owners the right to harm neighbors and cited polls showing 89% opposition to renewable projects.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 2:00:12 →Stated that a giant awakening has occurred among local residents who are committed to protecting their community from endless solar expansion.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 2:02:26 →Questioned public notification transparency, read a letter from landowner Laura Player regarding cumulative industrial impacts, and criticized dust and water use.
Board of Supervisors Regular — September 8, 2026 · 3:26:20 →