Roads

KTR fitness center

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (10)Opposed (11)

At a glance

Public comments
21
Last 30 days
21

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 10, 2026.

Public comments (21)

OpposedMikhail TipistNov 10, 2026

A Suffolk Hills property owner questioned why this location at all, noting many less residential-adjacent sites — like the town center — could host the facility.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 44:46 →
SupportiveEmily VeresNov 10, 2026

A Parks and Rec Advisory Board vice chair and mother of three urged approval, saying the town lacks year-round indoor kids' activities and the area is already heavily commercial.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 46:44 →
SupportiveShauna HuslingNov 10, 2026

An Oro Valley mom welcomed the development, saying families currently drive to Tucson, Marana, or Phoenix for indoor kids' activities.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 49:00 →
SupportiveBobbyNov 10, 2026

An Oro Valley parent who has used a Phoenix KTR praised the facilities and said the town would be excited to have one.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 50:46 →
OpposedCharles SplymanNov 10, 2026

Argued the project is really 43,644 square feet of commercial development with KTR as a small part, and urged denial of the rezoning and permit.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 52:02 →
OpposedAlan SueNov 10, 2026

A homeowner whose property directly adjoins the site raised traffic, noise, lighting, privacy, and property-value concerns, noting the zoning would outlast any tenant.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 55:31 →
OpposedCharles BlockNov 10, 2026

A Suffolk Drive resident asked detailed questions about party changeovers, turn-lane operations, bicycle-lane conflicts, and what protections remain if KTR closes, urging denial or continuance.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 58:47 →
OpposedGary BagnacciNov 10, 2026

A nearly 40-year Suffolk Hills resident argued the Suffolk Drive access is unnecessary, citing the Oracle/INA Medical Center's single-point access a quarter mile south.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:01:49 →
OpposedPatricia TraynorNov 10, 2026

A 40-year resident cited frequent accidents at the Suffolk/Oracle light, including two in one day, and asked for denial of the zoning and permit as designed.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:04:55 →
OpposedMike StackNov 10, 2026

A 30-year resident and educator walked through trip-generation math for restaurants and argued the project is fundamentally a volume question at the congested intersection.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:06:44 →
SupportiveMike LandNov 10, 2026

A retired law-enforcement officer endorsed the project, saying the vacant lot will develop either way and KTR is a wholesome, family-friendly use.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:09:46 →
OpposedLinda SnowNov 10, 2026

The Suffolk Hills HOA president asked for denial of the rezoning, citing the neighborhood's 1959 historic design, and requested a condition barring any Suffolk Drive driveway if approved.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:11:41 →
SupportiveTim KishNov 10, 2026

A two-time Oro Valley resident and youth-sports nonprofit president supported the project as a safe, mentorship-oriented opportunity for kids.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:15:34 →
OpposedCraig WaleyNov 10, 2026

A Suffolk Hills resident warned that drivers avoiding Oracle congestion will cut through Village Avenue and Old Ina, endangering walkers and cyclists on winding streets.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:18:34 →
SupportiveEifren CubioNov 10, 2026

The applicant's husband and a physician with a practice in Oro Valley supported the project, questioning the neighbors' pre-presentation petition and urging long-term thinking.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:20:50 →
OpposedEric DickinNov 10, 2026

A 28-year Suffolk Hills resident opposed the rezoning, saying R-S uses like medical offices fit the area, and noted no Phoenix-area KTR has driveway access into a residential neighborhood.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:22:14 →
SupportiveDane DenbyNov 10, 2026

An Oro Valley father of two supported the project, citing weekend spending leaving town and the applicant's unusual responsiveness to neighbor concerns.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:26:01 →
SupportiveRicky EmbleyNov 10, 2026

A University of Arizona athletics administrator and former NFL player supported the project, saying the kids are here and elite training facilities keep talent and money local.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:28:21 →
OpposedPamela ParkNov 10, 2026

A 31-year Suffolk Hills resident whose parents bought there in 1966 asked why an existing vacant building along Oracle couldn't be used instead of rezoning the land.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:30:31 →
SupportiveDavid GoldsteinNov 10, 2026

A 50-year Pima County resident supported the project, noting the town is already pursuing commercial annexations at Ina and Oracle.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:32:08 →
SupportiveLouise ThomasNov 10, 2026

The founder of Angel Charity for Children urged approval, saying the project serves toddlers through teens and offers jobs and healthy alternatives for youth.

Planning & Zoning Commission — November 10, 2026 · 1:33:23 →