Flock cameras

Opposed any resurrection of the Flock surveillance system, arguing it violates the Fourth Amendment and forces taxpayers to fund their own surveillance.

Supported keeping Flock, citing a February case it helped solve, and asked what the town would tell future victims if the capability is gone.

Congratulated officials on ending Flock but asked the council to publicly confirm the termination, deactivate all 18 cameras, certify data deletion, and publish the program's cost and performance record.

Via Zoom, thanked the council for ending the Flock contract, urged covering the cameras immediately until removal, and recalled members' oaths of office.

Criticized the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, home rule, and Flock cameras as serving the municipal corporation rather than the people, citing a 460% home-rule budget increase.