Stephen Q. Miller
No biography on file yet.
Voice
- Meetings spoken in
- 33
- Total speaking time
- 3:10:48
- Avg per meeting
- 5:47
- Segments
- 3420
Want every word Miller has said?
The OpenCity MCP for Claude.ai answers questions like “what has Miller said about housing this year” with one prompt — full speaking history, with YouTube timestamps.
Top issues during term (1)(Energy)
Decisions during term (31)
Recorded while Miller was in office — not necessarily decisions they moved, spoke to, or voted on.
PZ-PD-004-26 (Horseshoe Energy Project - PAD Severance)
PZ-PA-004-26 (Horseshoe Energy Project - Minor Comp Plan Amendment)
PZ-004-26 (Horseshoe Energy Project - Rezone)
PZ-PD-005-26 (Horseshoe Energy Project - PAD Overlay)
PZ-PA-012-26 (Rosebud Energy Project)
PZ-PA-014-26 (ASLD Solar and Battery Energy Storage Project)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment PZ-PA-019-25 for Desert Crest Energy Storage
Rezoning PZ-022-25 for Desert Crest Energy Storage
Planned Area Development PZ-PD-017-25 for Desert Crest Energy Storage
Continuance of PZ-PD-004-26 (Horseshoe Energy PAD Severance)
Continuance of PZ-PA-004-26 (Horseshoe Energy Plan Amendment)
Continuance of PZ-004-26 (Horseshoe Energy Rezone)
Continuance of PZ-PD-005-26 (Horseshoe Energy PAD Overlay)
Approval of Recommendation for PZ-PA-012-26 (Rosebud Energy Project)
Ordinance No. 2026-PZ-009-26 (Eloy Valley Energy Center 3 Rezone)
Ordinance No. 2026-PZ-PD-009-26 (Eloy Valley Energy Center 3 PAD)
Approval of Ordinance PZ-009-26 for Eloy Valley Energy Center 3 Rezone
Approval of Ordinance PZPD-009-26 for Eloy Valley Energy Center 3 PAD Overlay
Denial of La Osa Energy Center Rezone (Ordinance 2026-PZ-003-26)
Denial of La Osa Energy Center Rezone (Ordinance 2026 PZ 003-26 and PZPD 003-26)
Voting record (2)(Energy)
Oldest to newest — hover a bar for the item.
Denial of La Osa Energy Center Rezone (Ordinance 2026-PZ-003-26)
Expressed support for private property rights and economic development.
Denial of La Osa Energy Center Rezone (Ordinance 2026 PZ 003-26 and PZPD 003-26)
Voted in favor of the project, arguing that property owners have the right to use their land as desired and that the region needs power generation and technological infrastructure for national defense and economic growth.