Flock surveillance program

Cited constitutional limits, a federal ruling calling ALPR networks 'indiscriminate mass surveillance,' procurement emails showing the contract dodged council approval, and polling she funded showing 55.6% of Prescott voters oppose the cameras.

Argued the issue is control, not safety; said Flock owns and monetizes the data, cited a FOIA-obtained price list, and warned about federal backdoor access to the data.

Delivered a basket with 700 petition signatures opposing the system, said the Condor pan-tilt cameras can read phones, and revealed the ACLU has contacted him about next steps and a possible recall effort.

Drew on his youth in divided Germany to warn against surveillance states, and described the Israeli TOCA cyber-surveillance platform's capabilities for altering video evidence.

Urged the council to cancel Flock contracts, arguing the cameras create a permanent digital trail of law-abiding residents and that over 100 cities have already terminated such contracts.

An AI researcher with two patents called Flock the worst-designed system he's ever seen professionally, citing audit failures, accuracy disputes, and Flock's dropped no-sales promise.

A Yavapai County resident who came to oppose Flock but said prior speakers had covered everything; called it a terrible idea.

A 40-year resident who passes Flock cameras daily; criticized Flock's business model, data ownership, and the haveibeenflocked.com breach site, and invoked the First Amendment.