Pronghorn Park Cell Tower
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 8, 2026.
Public comments (3)
Pronghorn Ranch resident asked for a 30-day postponement, saying the application appears incomplete and non-compliant; her group has hired a lawyer and questions why existing towers at Viewpoint Park and along SR-89A aren't being used.
Town Council Regular Meeting — October 8, 2026 · 14:45 →Also of Pronghorn Ranch, he cited appraisal research that towers within 1,500 feet cut home values 10–20% — potentially $2 million in community equity loss — and asked for a 30-day delay and future 1,500-foot setbacks in town code.
Town Council Regular Meeting — October 8, 2026 · 18:00 →Asked the council to postpone the tower vote, noting the tower would sit 350 feet from homes and over ballfields; cited an existing tower less than a mile away, code co-location preferences, and a three-week public records delay that hampered legal review.
Town Council Regular Meeting — October 8, 2026 · 36:16 →