Arizona Record
Surprise
Environment

Battery energy storage systems

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
1
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 6, 2026.

Public comments (17)

SupportiveMatthew RagsdaleAug 6, 2026

A representative from Key Capture Energy spoke in favor of the 100-foot setback based on NFPA and fire risk standards.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 20:20 →
SupportiveAutumn JohnsonAug 6, 2026

Speaking for the Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association, she supported the 100-foot setback and suggested incorporating plume study pathways.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 21:25 →
SupportiveKimberly FaddoulAug 6, 2026

A Glendale resident and former teacher spoke in favor of clean, reliable energy and the 100-foot setback ordinance.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 24:20 →
SupportiveChristiana Fadul-PepperAug 6, 2026

A Buckeye resident supported the 100-foot setback, emphasizing modern safety features and regional competitiveness.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 27:16 →
SupportiveJessica PerryAug 6, 2026

An APS public affairs manager highlighted the importance of energy storage for grid reliability and supported the 100-foot setback or plume study option.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 29:38 →
SupportiveManuel GutierrezAug 6, 2026

A representative of Veterans Power America supported clean energy reliability, veteran job opportunities, and the 100-foot setback.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 31:39 →
SupportiveMike JohnsonAug 6, 2026

A Surprise landowner expressed support for the 100-foot setback, noting it aligns with industry standards and realistic infrastructure needs.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 17:22 →
ConcernedSarah NgoMay 21, 2026

Expressed concern over the lengthy Type 3 rezone process and administrative discretion creating uncertainty for developers.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 33:39 →
SupportiveSipan AlizadehMay 21, 2026

Supported BESS technology for tech sector growth and requested a reduction in the 1,500-foot separation requirement.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 1:01:00 →
SupportiveChristiana Fadul-PepperMay 21, 2026

Urged the city to update rules to reflect modern safety standards and bring economic benefits without being overly restrictive.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 39:10 →
SupportiveJeremy AtkinMay 21, 2026

Expressed support for moving forward promptly with battery projects despite conservative setback proposals.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 19:17 →
SupportiveJames CaulfieldMay 21, 2026

Provided expert fire safety information regarding battery energy storage systems and offered assistance to the city.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 20:21 →
ConcernedMatthew RagsdaleMay 21, 2026

Argued that the 1,500-foot setback is not supported by data and urged a more reasonable standard.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 23:13 →
ConcernedMike JohnsonMay 21, 2026

Recommended a 150-foot setback from residences and 50 feet from property lines, citing neighboring cities.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 23:33 →
ConcernedAutumn JohnsonMay 21, 2026

Expressed concerns about the ordinance's scope and restrictive setbacks, recommending objective noise standards.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 26:49 →
ConcernedJames JacksonMay 21, 2026

Stated that proposed setbacks exceed industry standards and urged alignment with Maricopa County rules.

Planning and Zoning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 30:17 →
NeutralMatthew RagsdaleApr 23, 2026

Introduced himself as a developer with Key Capture Energy and offered company expertise as a resource for upcoming battery storage workshops.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Apr 23, 2026 · 1:00:10 →