Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) Zoning Text Amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 6, 2026.
Public comments (7)
A Surprise landowner expressed support for the 100-foot setback, noting it aligns with industry standards and realistic infrastructure needs.
Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 17:22 →A representative from Key Capture Energy spoke in favor of the 100-foot setback based on NFPA and fire risk standards.
Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 20:20 →Speaking for the Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association, she supported the 100-foot setback and suggested incorporating plume study pathways.
Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 21:25 →A Glendale resident and former teacher spoke in favor of clean, reliable energy and the 100-foot setback ordinance.
Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 24:20 →A Buckeye resident supported the 100-foot setback, emphasizing modern safety features and regional competitiveness.
Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 27:16 →An APS public affairs manager highlighted the importance of energy storage for grid reliability and supported the 100-foot setback or plume study option.
Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 29:38 →A representative of Veterans Power America supported clean energy reliability, veteran job opportunities, and the 100-foot setback.
Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 6, 2026 · 31:39 →