Item 10: BESS Zoning Text Amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 1, 2026.
Public comments (11)
Represented Western Way supporting affordable, reliable energy and the 100-foot setback.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 55:16 →Representing Key Capture Energy, supported the 100-foot setback grounded in facts and data.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 1:04:04 →Spoke on behalf of Vets Forward supporting the 100-foot setback for reliable energy and grid stability.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 47:19 →Represented Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association supporting the 100-foot setback.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 53:23 →Spoke in favor of the 100-foot BESS setback, citing modern safety tech and community growth.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 1:00:53 →Representing APS, proposed a variable setback range from 100 to 500 feet to build trust and flexibility.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 1:05:05 →Landowner supporting the 100-foot setback and questioning additional restrictions.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 1:08:46 →Supported the 100-foot setback on behalf of Solar United Neighbors, highlighting safety and local clean energy benefits.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 52:17 →Expressed support for clean energy storage to ensure reliable power and safety.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 58:09 →Planning Commissioner urged approval of the 100-foot setback, citing modern safety standards and energy needs.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 49:04 →Representing NextEra Energy Resources, criticized the overlay framework and encouraged regional consistency.
Regular City Council Meeting - Sep 1, 2026 · 1:09:44 →