Development

Molly's Spa

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (3)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedLane CarrawayMar 24, 2026

Expressed strong opposition to the massage spa, citing past problems with illicit businesses in the shopping center and a lack of neighborhood outreach.

Development Review Commission (Study) — March 24, 2026 · 15:16 →
OpposedKathy BrandMar 24, 2026

Raised concerns about human trafficking and illicit massage parlors, stating she could not find corporate or state massage licenses for the applicant.

Development Review Commission (Study) — March 24, 2026 · 18:09 →
OpposedNancy BakerMar 24, 2026

Echoed neighbor concerns about neighborhood safety, transparency, and compatibility, urging the commission to deny the application.

Development Review Commission (Study) — March 24, 2026 · 21:33 →
SupportiveReed ColsteadMar 24, 2026

Spoke in support of the applicant, stating he has operated legitimate massage businesses for 13 years and vouching for the applicant's professional background.

Development Review Commission (Study) — March 24, 2026 · 22:55 →