Zoning

Camino Madre wind project

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (12)

At a glance

Public comments
13
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 1, 2026.

Public comments (13)

OpposedBob JohnsonJul 1, 2026

Retired Exelon utility executive argued the project has no power purchase agreement, could harm grid economics, and offers no benefit to Arizona residents.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:09:01 →
OpposedWendy ErnstJul 1, 2026

Read a statement from the Seligman Chamber of Commerce president clarifying the Chamber never endorsed the project and opposes it.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:12:09 →
OpposedM. McLeishJul 1, 2026

Briefly thanked the Board for listening to so many concerned residents.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:15:31 →
OpposedRichard TwistJul 1, 2026

Seligman resident whose two properties would be affected; said wildlife does not return after turbine construction, based on his California experience.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:15:59 →
OpposedPaul CrawfordJul 1, 2026

Sierra Verde Ranch resident described the project as a 'punch in the gut' — 76 turbines killing the viewshed, plus solar panels and a battery facility.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:18:38 →
OpposedBarbara WelkerJul 1, 2026

Seligman resident and rancher; her nine-year-old grandson Blake also spoke, asking the Board to protect the land and water for kids' futures.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:21:57 →
OpposedSean BuellJul 1, 2026

Longtime Seligman firefighter/EMT and father of two fallen service members; his property borders the project and much of it is forested, not desolate.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:25:05 →
OpposedKaty PetotyJul 1, 2026

Focused on zoning: urged the Board to keep the area rural residential and reject rezoning or special use for wind farms.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:28:06 →
OpposedMario PetotyJul 1, 2026

Engineer by trade; doubts the promised 350 local construction jobs and questions where water for concrete would come from.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:29:39 →
OpposedKen BrantinghamJul 1, 2026

Lives a half mile from the project; said 76 turbines over 54 square miles would decimate the environment and transfer wealth from residents to investors.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:32:02 →
OpposedJay AyersJul 1, 2026

Retired, lives less than half a mile from the closest proposed turbine; worries about fire, water tables, eagles, and dark skies.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:34:31 →
OpposedAnna GonzalezJul 1, 2026

Owns the Aztec Motel on Route 66; said the pristine Route 66 corridor brings more tourism revenue than the project would.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:37:36 →
MixedBill FeldmeyerJul 1, 2026

The local contact for Triple Oak — acknowledged the fears, said concerns are legitimate, and promised answers before the application is filed.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA-2026 — July 1, 2026 · 2:38:51 →